Varney v. Ditmars Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained Austin brought suit in New York state court to recover the price increases agreed to by Loral. The trial and appellate courts held in Austin's favor, and Loral Hauer v. Union State Bank of Wautoma Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Black Industries, Inc. v. Bush Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 35900 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 984 casebooks
Acme Mills & Elevator Co. v. Johnson Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained The court's majority opinion found that Loral Corporation was indeed under economic duress when it agreed to higher prices demanded by Austin Instrument. Ferguson v. Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Duncan v. Hensley Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained Oliver v. Ball Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained Centech Group, Inc. v. Getronicswang Co. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
L. Albert & Son v. Armstrong Rubber Co. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained Condra v. Atlanta Orthopaedic Group Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 36300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 984 casebooks Contract Law 58 IV Zapatha v Dairy Mart This case is a landmark decision in contract law that solidifies the modern doctrine of economic duress or 'business compulsion.' It clarifies that a wrongful
Zapatha v. Dairy Mart, Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained Douglass v. Pflueger Hawaii, Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp | Case Brief for Law Students IV. Contract Performance E. Express Conditions In Re Carter's Claim (failing finances) To access case file, copy and paste link Odorizzi v. Bloomfield School District Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
In July of 1965, Loral was awarded a $6,000,000 contract by the Navy for the production of radar sets. The contract contained a schedule of deliveries, a Radke v. Brenon (1965) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary Defendant Loral won a $6 million contract from the Navy to build radar sets. Plaintiff Austin won a sub-contract for delivery of 23 of
The defendants offered to sell a strip of land to the plaintiff and eight other neighbors, but there was a delay due to issues with the Wassenaar v. Towne Hotel Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
IV. Contract Performance C. Duty of Good Faith Zapatha v. Dairy Mart (terminated franchise) To access case file, copy and paste Wolf v. Marlton Corp. (1959) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Contract Law 45 III Austin Instrument v Loral Locks v. Wade Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Sedmak v. Charlie's Chevrolet, Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained This case considers whether duress can be economic in nature and if it can, whether it is actionable as a vehicle to recover damages.
Austin Instr. v Loral Corp. The Wolfs (plaintiffs, husband and wife) sought to recover a $2450 deposit made under a contract to purchase a house that the Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp. | Module 11 | Contracts Law
Beachcomber Coins, Inc. v. Boskett Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained C.R. Klewin, Inc. v. Flagship Properties Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Austin Instrument v. Loral Corp. – Case Brief Summary – Facts Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 20000 case briefs (and counting) keyed to over 223 casebooks
Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp. (1971) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary Austin Instrument v. Loral Corp. – (IRAC) Case Brief Summary
Austin Instrument v. Loral Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained V. Remedies B. Breach by the Buyer Am. Mech. Corp. v. Union of Lynn (duty to mitigate) To access case file, copy and paste link Brian Construction & Developlment Co. v Brighenti Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
O'Callaghan v. Waller & Beckwith Realty Co. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained Defendant Loral entered a contract with the Navy to furnish radars. As part of their subcontracting, Defendant hired Plaintiff Austin
Merry Gentleman, LLC v. George and Leona Productions, Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp. - Case Briefs in About a Minute
Goodman v. Dicker Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained Hurst v. W.J. Lake & Co. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Facts of the case: In July of 1965, Loral was awarded a $ 6,000,000 contract by the Navy for the production of radar sets. The contract contained a schedule Chicago Coliseum Club v. Dempsey Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained "Revisiting Austin v. Loral: A Study in Economic Duress, Contract
Contract Law 70 V American Mechanical Corp v Union of Lynn Austin sued Loral to recover money still due on the second subcontract, but Loral also sued Austin for the amount of the price increases, claimed they were Irving v. Town of Clinton Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
KGM Harvesting Company v. Fresh Network Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained Transatlantic Financing Corp. v. U.S. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Weintraub v. Krobatsch Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained Colfax Envelope Corp. v. Local No. 458-3M Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
The case is about a dispute between Austin Instrument, Inc. and Loral Corporation over payment for goods delivered under a Beneficial National Bank, U.S.A. v. Payton Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp. Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks This is NOT legal advice. This does NOT make you my client. Everything about this brief is SUMMARIZED. Please Like and
Merritt Hill Vineyards, Inc. v. Windy Heights Vineyard, Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained Watkins & Son v. Carrig - Case Briefs in About a Minute
Swinton v. Whitinsville Savings Bank - Case Briefs in About a Minute Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp. is a favorite among Contracts casebooks because the New York Court of Appeals held that it was a "classic" example of
Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp. Case Brief | Lexplug | Lexplug Farnum v. Silvano Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
III. SPECIAL CONTROLS ON PROMISSORY LIABILITY – FORMATION DEFENSES D. Duress and Undue Influence Austin Loveless v. Diehl Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Byers v. Federal Land Co. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Contract Law 61 IV re Carter Express Conditions After Austin had entered upon the performance of that subcontract, Loral was awarded an additional contract by the government for radar equipment and Austin
Issue. The main issue was whether Loral Corporation acted under economic duress when it agreed to Austin Instrument's demands for price increases and additional Austin Instrument, Inc., v. Loral Corporation - brief